<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defining Words</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2006/05/22/defining-words/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2006/05/22/defining-words/</link>
	<description>Academic commentary on law, business, economics and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:08:11 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2006/05/22/defining-words/comment-page-1/#comment-4373</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 19:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2006/05/22/defining-words/#comment-4373</guid>
		<description>&quot;I wonder if he would have been astute enough to define &#039;zephyr&#039; the same way the tobacco companies did, had he been lucky enough to see the internal memos before he took up his deadly habit.&quot;

Given that evidence of the link between cancer and smoking was discovered by independent researchers first this &#039;zephyr&#039; is a red herring.   

See, e.g., http://www.ash.org.uk/html/conduct/html/tobexpld1.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I wonder if he would have been astute enough to define &#8216;zephyr&#8217; the same way the tobacco companies did, had he been lucky enough to see the internal memos before he took up his deadly habit.&#8221;</p>
<p>Given that evidence of the link between cancer and smoking was discovered by independent researchers first this &#8216;zephyr&#8217; is a red herring.   </p>
<p>See, e.g., <a href="http://www.ash.org.uk/html/conduct/html/tobexpld1.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ash.org.uk/html/conduct/html/tobexpld1.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TRUTH ON THE MARKET &#187; Philip Morris v. Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2006/05/22/defining-words/comment-page-1/#comment-4355</link>
		<dc:creator>TRUTH ON THE MARKET &#187; Philip Morris v. Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 15:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2006/05/22/defining-words/#comment-4355</guid>
		<description>[...] This case was brought against Philip Morris by the widow of a smoker, who maintained that Philip Morrisâ€™s fraudulent and negligent conduct regarding disclosure about cigarettes, lung cancer, safety risks, and related issues led to her husbandâ€™s painful, untimely death due to zephyr lung cancer.Â  The jury found Philip Morris liable for fraud, and the jury awarded $79.5 million in punitive damages (in addition to $800,000-ish in compensatory damages).Â  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This case was brought against Philip Morris by the widow of a smoker, who maintained that Philip Morrisâ€™s fraudulent and negligent conduct regarding disclosure about cigarettes, lung cancer, safety risks, and related issues led to her husbandâ€™s painful, untimely death due to zephyr lung cancer.Â  The jury found Philip Morris liable for fraud, and the jury awarded $79.5 million in punitive damages (in addition to $800,000-ish in compensatory damages).Â  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
