<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dow Jones Board Action:  Nice exam question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2007/05/03/dow-jones-board-action-nice-exam-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2007/05/03/dow-jones-board-action-nice-exam-question/</link>
	<description>Academic commentary on law, business, economics and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:39:26 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Corporate Research Group - Global Corporate Governance Research and Policy Think Tank</title>
		<link>http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2007/05/03/dow-jones-board-action-nice-exam-question/comment-page-1/#comment-101405</link>
		<dc:creator>Corporate Research Group - Global Corporate Governance Research and Policy Think Tank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 22:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2007/05/03/dow-jones-board-action-nice-exam-question/#comment-101405</guid>
		<description>[...] excellent commentary dealing with this question is available on the blogosphere already here, here and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] excellent commentary dealing with this question is available on the blogosphere already here, here and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProfessorBainbridge.com Â®</title>
		<link>http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2007/05/03/dow-jones-board-action-nice-exam-question/comment-page-1/#comment-100944</link>
		<dc:creator>ProfessorBainbridge.com Â®</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 18:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2007/05/03/dow-jones-board-action-nice-exam-question/#comment-100944</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Fiduciary Duties of the Bancroft Family and the Dow Jones Board...&lt;/strong&gt;

By now you will have heard that Rupert Murdoch made a run at the Dow Jones Company, publishers of the Wall Street Journal. Elizabeth Nowicki asks:Does a bid for Dow Jones implicate Revlon duties? Can a board â€œjust say noâ€?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Fiduciary Duties of the Bancroft Family and the Dow Jones Board&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>By now you will have heard that Rupert Murdoch made a run at the Dow Jones Company, publishers of the Wall Street Journal. Elizabeth Nowicki asks:Does a bid for Dow Jones implicate Revlon duties? Can a board â€œjust say noâ€?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Donegal</title>
		<link>http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2007/05/03/dow-jones-board-action-nice-exam-question/comment-page-1/#comment-100939</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Donegal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 18:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2007/05/03/dow-jones-board-action-nice-exam-question/#comment-100939</guid>
		<description>I&quot;m curious why, at this point in the proceedings, you think this is a good exam question?  At this point, this isn&#039;t even a close call.  There are no Revlon duties yet and yes, a board can just say no.  This would be a much more interesting question if the Board felt that the News Corp offer was inadequate, but the family&#039;s attorney advised the board that 52% of the shares wanted to take it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8221;m curious why, at this point in the proceedings, you think this is a good exam question?  At this point, this isn&#8217;t even a close call.  There are no Revlon duties yet and yes, a board can just say no.  This would be a much more interesting question if the Board felt that the News Corp offer was inadequate, but the family&#8217;s attorney advised the board that 52% of the shares wanted to take it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
