One can rightly criticize Moore’s film on many grounds. However, it must also be acknowledged that Moore has accomplished two primary objectives with the film: he is making money; and he’s getting people to talk about health care issues. Neither of these is a bad thing.
Comment by Steven Donegal — July 9, 2007 @ 8:51 am
Arnold Kling fisks this review pretty well at EconLib.
http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2007/07/austan_goolsbee.html
Adverse selection, indeed.
Comment by M. Hodak — July 5, 2007 @ 8:12 pm
One can rightly criticize Moore’s film on many grounds. However, it must also be acknowledged that Moore has accomplished two primary objectives with the film: he is making money; and he’s getting people to talk about health care issues. Neither of these is a bad thing.
Comment by Steven Donegal — July 9, 2007 @ 8:51 am