<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Academic Buzzwords</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/06/26/academic-buzzwords/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/06/26/academic-buzzwords/</link>
	<description>Academic commentary on law, business, economics and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:39:26 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Chen</title>
		<link>http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/06/26/academic-buzzwords/comment-page-1/#comment-143904</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Chen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/06/26/academic-buzzwords/#comment-143904</guid>
		<description>Worse than &quot;incentivize&quot; is its appalling short form, &quot;incent.&quot;  It hurts to type that, even by way of reporting the atrocity.

I also nominate &quot;empirics.&quot;  If you mean empirical data, empirical analysis, or empiricism, then say so.  These are distinct concepts, and the shortcut so many law professors use actually has a different meaning.  &quot;Empiric&quot; = &quot;medical quack.&quot;

I&#039;ve written more on this topic at http://jurisdynamics.blogspot.com/2006/10/getting-catty-about-legal-language.html.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worse than &#8220;incentivize&#8221; is its appalling short form, &#8220;incent.&#8221;  It hurts to type that, even by way of reporting the atrocity.</p>
<p>I also nominate &#8220;empirics.&#8221;  If you mean empirical data, empirical analysis, or empiricism, then say so.  These are distinct concepts, and the shortcut so many law professors use actually has a different meaning.  &#8220;Empiric&#8221; = &#8220;medical quack.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve written more on this topic at <a href="http://jurisdynamics.blogspot.com/2006/10/getting-catty-about-legal-language.html." rel="nofollow">http://jurisdynamics.blogspot.com/2006/10/getting-catty-about-legal-language.html.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thom</title>
		<link>http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/06/26/academic-buzzwords/comment-page-1/#comment-143903</link>
		<dc:creator>Thom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/06/26/academic-buzzwords/#comment-143903</guid>
		<description>Incentivize.  Whatever happened to &quot;motivate&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incentivize.  Whatever happened to &#8220;motivate&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
