<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is the Worst Antitrust Decision That is Good Law?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/07/22/what-is-the-worst-antitrust-decision-that-is-good-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/07/22/what-is-the-worst-antitrust-decision-that-is-good-law/</link>
	<description>Academic commentary on law, business, economics and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 01:17:44 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BRJ</title>
		<link>http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/07/22/what-is-the-worst-antitrust-decision-that-is-good-law/comment-page-1/#comment-143934</link>
		<dc:creator>BRJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/07/22/what-is-the-worst-antitrust-decision-that-is-good-law/#comment-143934</guid>
		<description>Point taken, Josh.  This one may get bounced on procedural grounds as well, but I would put Alcoa on the list.  

While cases like Grinnell and Aspen Ski have added some gloss, the notion that certain, otherwise legal business conduct is off limits to a monopolist by sheer virtue of the company&#039;s size is still hanging around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point taken, Josh.  This one may get bounced on procedural grounds as well, but I would put Alcoa on the list.  </p>
<p>While cases like Grinnell and Aspen Ski have added some gloss, the notion that certain, otherwise legal business conduct is off limits to a monopolist by sheer virtue of the company&#8217;s size is still hanging around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/07/22/what-is-the-worst-antitrust-decision-that-is-good-law/comment-page-1/#comment-143933</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/07/22/what-is-the-worst-antitrust-decision-that-is-good-law/#comment-143933</guid>
		<description>Standard Stations gets my vote.  Rejects the rule of reason for exclusive dealing and instead adopts the &quot;quantitative&quot; foreclosure rule, which as Hovenkamp, Handler and others pointed out might as well be per se liability, given that 6.7% foreclosure was sufficient.  Plus, its dicta persuaded the Court in MPAA (which is also a good candidate for the worst decision) to aggregate the foreclosure shares of non-conspiring defendants - a decision which has allowed plaintiffs in some jurisdictions to maintain antitrust suits challenging loyalty discounts and other vertical practices against competitors with tiny market shares.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Standard Stations gets my vote.  Rejects the rule of reason for exclusive dealing and instead adopts the &#8220;quantitative&#8221; foreclosure rule, which as Hovenkamp, Handler and others pointed out might as well be per se liability, given that 6.7% foreclosure was sufficient.  Plus, its dicta persuaded the Court in MPAA (which is also a good candidate for the worst decision) to aggregate the foreclosure shares of non-conspiring defendants &#8211; a decision which has allowed plaintiffs in some jurisdictions to maintain antitrust suits challenging loyalty discounts and other vertical practices against competitors with tiny market shares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/07/22/what-is-the-worst-antitrust-decision-that-is-good-law/comment-page-1/#comment-143932</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 03:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/07/22/what-is-the-worst-antitrust-decision-that-is-good-law/#comment-143932</guid>
		<description>Brian: A good place to start on my views is here:
http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2007/06/30/evaluating-leegin/

David: Topco is definitely a top (bottom?) 5 in my book.

BRJ: I agree both of those are pretty bad, but you aren&#039;t playing by the rules.  We need SCOTUS decisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian: A good place to start on my views is here:<br />
<a href="http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2007/06/30/evaluating-leegin/" rel="nofollow">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2007/06/30/evaluating-leegin/</a></p>
<p>David: Topco is definitely a top (bottom?) 5 in my book.</p>
<p>BRJ: I agree both of those are pretty bad, but you aren&#8217;t playing by the rules.  We need SCOTUS decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BRJ</title>
		<link>http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/07/22/what-is-the-worst-antitrust-decision-that-is-good-law/comment-page-1/#comment-143930</link>
		<dc:creator>BRJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/07/22/what-is-the-worst-antitrust-decision-that-is-good-law/#comment-143930</guid>
		<description>For more recent cases, LePage&#039;s and Conwood are both pretty bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For more recent cases, LePage&#8217;s and Conwood are both pretty bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/07/22/what-is-the-worst-antitrust-decision-that-is-good-law/comment-page-1/#comment-143929</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/07/22/what-is-the-worst-antitrust-decision-that-is-good-law/#comment-143929</guid>
		<description>I nominate Topco!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I nominate Topco!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/07/22/what-is-the-worst-antitrust-decision-that-is-good-law/comment-page-1/#comment-143928</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/07/22/what-is-the-worst-antitrust-decision-that-is-good-law/#comment-143928</guid>
		<description>Why do you think Leegin was a good decision when it is hurting consumers as we speak?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you think Leegin was a good decision when it is hurting consumers as we speak?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
