<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Citigroup, Wachovia, Wells Fargo, the Exclusivity Agreement, and Specific Performance&#8230; and the Huntsman Opinion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/10/03/citigroup-wachovia-wells-fargo-the-exclusivity-agreement-and-specific-performance-and-the-huntsman-opinion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/10/03/citigroup-wachovia-wells-fargo-the-exclusivity-agreement-and-specific-performance-and-the-huntsman-opinion/</link>
	<description>Academic commentary on law, business, economics and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:08:11 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kinabalu</title>
		<link>http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/10/03/citigroup-wachovia-wells-fargo-the-exclusivity-agreement-and-specific-performance-and-the-huntsman-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-144013</link>
		<dc:creator>Kinabalu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 04:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/10/03/citigroup-wachovia-wells-fargo-the-exclusivity-agreement-and-specific-performance-and-the-huntsman-opinion/#comment-144013</guid>
		<description>Specific performance only means that Wachovia must submit the offer to its shareholders. They can not be required to do more than their articles of incorporation require. Without the permission of the Wachovia shareholders there can be no deal. The only way Citi will get their approval is to make a better offer than Wells.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Specific performance only means that Wachovia must submit the offer to its shareholders. They can not be required to do more than their articles of incorporation require. Without the permission of the Wachovia shareholders there can be no deal. The only way Citi will get their approval is to make a better offer than Wells.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: north fork investor</title>
		<link>http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/10/03/citigroup-wachovia-wells-fargo-the-exclusivity-agreement-and-specific-performance-and-the-huntsman-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-144011</link>
		<dc:creator>north fork investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 15:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/10/03/citigroup-wachovia-wells-fargo-the-exclusivity-agreement-and-specific-performance-and-the-huntsman-opinion/#comment-144011</guid>
		<description>I fail to see the relevancy of Lamb&#039;s decision in the Huntsman case to the situation at hand.  But I did agree with your interpretation of the letter contract&#039;s specific performance language versus Davidoff&#039;s.  Ramsey&#039;s TRO (haven&#039;t seen the language yet) appears to support your viewpoint. The parties have a week to talk without interference from WFC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fail to see the relevancy of Lamb&#8217;s decision in the Huntsman case to the situation at hand.  But I did agree with your interpretation of the letter contract&#8217;s specific performance language versus Davidoff&#8217;s.  Ramsey&#8217;s TRO (haven&#8217;t seen the language yet) appears to support your viewpoint. The parties have a week to talk without interference from WFC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Tuchler</title>
		<link>http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/10/03/citigroup-wachovia-wells-fargo-the-exclusivity-agreement-and-specific-performance-and-the-huntsman-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-144009</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Tuchler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 19:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/10/03/citigroup-wachovia-wells-fargo-the-exclusivity-agreement-and-specific-performance-and-the-huntsman-opinion/#comment-144009</guid>
		<description>Of course, whether or not the remedy of specific performance is available is within the discretion of the court.  The contract provision does not guarantee that there will be specific performance imposed on Wachovia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, whether or not the remedy of specific performance is available is within the discretion of the court.  The contract provision does not guarantee that there will be specific performance imposed on Wachovia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vania Shaw</title>
		<link>http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/10/03/citigroup-wachovia-wells-fargo-the-exclusivity-agreement-and-specific-performance-and-the-huntsman-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-144008</link>
		<dc:creator>Vania Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 22:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/10/03/citigroup-wachovia-wells-fargo-the-exclusivity-agreement-and-specific-performance-and-the-huntsman-opinion/#comment-144008</guid>
		<description>Ms. Nowicki:

How many $1.2 Billion tort claim cases have you tried to jury verdict?

How many $1.2 Billion breach of contract cases have you tried to jury verdict?

Isn&#039;t it true that you are an alumni of the law firm that negotiated the exclusivity agreement for one of the parties?  Care to tell us which firm and who they represent in this deal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms. Nowicki:</p>
<p>How many $1.2 Billion tort claim cases have you tried to jury verdict?</p>
<p>How many $1.2 Billion breach of contract cases have you tried to jury verdict?</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it true that you are an alumni of the law firm that negotiated the exclusivity agreement for one of the parties?  Care to tell us which firm and who they represent in this deal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
