<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TradeComet.com v. Google (UPDATED: With Complaint)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2009/02/18/tradecometcom-v-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2009/02/18/tradecometcom-v-google/</link>
	<description>Academic commentary on law, business, economics and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:06:49 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TradeComet complaint against Google dismissed &#124; TRUTH ON THE MARKET</title>
		<link>http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2009/02/18/tradecometcom-v-google/comment-page-1/#comment-145764</link>
		<dc:creator>TradeComet complaint against Google dismissed &#124; TRUTH ON THE MARKET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2009/02/18/tradecometcom-v-google/#comment-145764</guid>
		<description>[...] antitrust suit against Google has been dismissed by the S.D.N.Y. Court in which the case was being heard.  The opinion is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] antitrust suit against Google has been dismissed by the S.D.N.Y. Court in which the case was being heard.  The opinion is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yong Chao</title>
		<link>http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2009/02/18/tradecometcom-v-google/comment-page-1/#comment-144326</link>
		<dc:creator>Yong Chao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2009/02/18/tradecometcom-v-google/#comment-144326</guid>
		<description>Given the information above, it looks more like refusal to deal. 

The same as Thom, it is interesting to see what&#039;s really going on in this case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the information above, it looks more like refusal to deal. </p>
<p>The same as Thom, it is interesting to see what&#8217;s really going on in this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thom</title>
		<link>http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2009/02/18/tradecometcom-v-google/comment-page-1/#comment-144325</link>
		<dc:creator>Thom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2009/02/18/tradecometcom-v-google/#comment-144325</guid>
		<description>TradeComet had better have more than this press release suggests.  Where&#039;s the unreasonably exclusionary conduct?  Raising the price you charge to a competitor?  It seems Trinko would foreclose that theory.  Inducing TradeComet to expend resources to make changes and then not reducing price as promised?  That sounds like a breach of contract, at worst.  Would that count as unreasonably exclusionary conduct so as to warrant imposition of treble damages in antitrust?  I look forward to reading the complaint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TradeComet had better have more than this press release suggests.  Where&#8217;s the unreasonably exclusionary conduct?  Raising the price you charge to a competitor?  It seems Trinko would foreclose that theory.  Inducing TradeComet to expend resources to make changes and then not reducing price as promised?  That sounds like a breach of contract, at worst.  Would that count as unreasonably exclusionary conduct so as to warrant imposition of treble damages in antitrust?  I look forward to reading the complaint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
