<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should PeaceHealth Apply to De Facto Exclusive Dealing Claims?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2009/11/10/should-peacehealth-apply-to-de-facto-exclusive-dealing-claims/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2009/11/10/should-peacehealth-apply-to-de-facto-exclusive-dealing-claims/</link>
	<description>Academic commentary on law, business, economics and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:18:33 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TRUTH ON THE MARKET &#187; PeaceHealth and De Facto Exclusive Dealing, Part III</title>
		<link>http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2009/11/10/should-peacehealth-apply-to-de-facto-exclusive-dealing-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-145054</link>
		<dc:creator>TRUTH ON THE MARKET &#187; PeaceHealth and De Facto Exclusive Dealing, Part III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/?p=3087#comment-145054</guid>
		<description>[...] thoughtful response (Bitchslap? Nah.) to my post criticizing the Ninth Circuit&#8217;s recent Masimo decision raises a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] thoughtful response (Bitchslap? Nah.) to my post criticizing the Ninth Circuit&#8217;s recent Masimo decision raises a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
